Casino loyalty and VIP programmes
A reader comparing Casino programmes needs to understand how someone qualifies, what each tier offers and which conditions remain private or unknown. The catalogue proposal allows editors to explain those advertised programmes without tracking an individual player's membership.
This family is proposed, with no delivery selected. It describes external Casino programmes; online.casino's own community rewards are a separate subject.
What a programme would explain
A proposed programme record describes what an external Casino advertises: qualification, tier definitions, progression or reset periods, recurring benefits, invitation conditions and programme terms. A tier belongs to its programme's applicable terms and owns its advertised benefits. A personal account manager, for example, is a service benefit with conditions, not a bonus amount.
A benefit may have several distinct time concepts. A recurring reload can have a duration, a claim frequency and a calculation lookback. Those periods cannot be reduced to one "days" value. Tier-dependent amounts or timing need to remain attached to the applicable tier. A private or undisclosed qualification rule stays unknown.
The wider proposal allows one genuinely shared programme identity to have separate applicable terms for different products or markets. Sources must establish that it is the same programme; matching names or similar terms are insufficient. Cross-context sharing and the exact applicability dimensions are still to be agreed.
The programme catalogue describes published terms, not a player's current tier, progression or private account. Casino programme points are also separate from online.casino Community Points, contributor reputation and rewards.
Read the periods separately
For an illustrative recurring benefit, "available for seven days", "claim once a day" and "calculated from the previous week's activity" describe three different periods. Keeping only "seven days" would lose when the benefit can be claimed and how it is calculated. The same care applies when different tiers have different amounts, eligibility or service benefits.
The catalogue would describe the advertised calculation, not calculate a player's entitlement. It would not know someone's current tier simply because they read the programme page. An invitation-only rule can remain unknown rather than become an invented qualification threshold.
Description before comparison
A reviewed description can explain a new perk before there is a structured filter for it. Typed comparison needs agreed definitions, applicable sources and rules for matching. Programme retirement and changes to tier terms also need a selected publication contract before delivery.
See future capabilities for the dependency map and catalogue and publication to review whether this family should be selected as a later catalogue increment.