Review and publication
Editors turn supported information into content readers can rely on. They check what a source says, resolve the applicable market and terms, and approve the exact content that should become public. Saving a draft is a separate step.
Human approval and retained publication history are agreed principles. The manual catalogue workflow described here is proposed. It can work with sources entered by staff, without waiting for automated collection or generated copy.
A correction from source to page
Imagine that an editor finds a new withdrawal fee in a Casino's published payment terms. The proposed workflow is:
- Keep the source material and when it was obtained.
- Attach it to the relevant payment method, currency and withdrawal condition.
- Prepare the corrected fact and its explanation in the required language.
- Review that exact candidate, including any conflicting source statement.
- Approve and publish the revision, retaining who decided, when and why.
The previously approved content remains public while the correction is a draft. A failed publication must leave the previous selection intact. A later editor can inspect the earlier publication and the support used at the time.
Review the whole meaning of a claim
A source link alone is not enough: the page behind it can change. Editors need the relevant retained material and its context. A fee for one payment method must not accidentally become the fee for every method. A cap on spin winnings must remain attached to that benefit.
When sources disagree, both statements stay available for review. A later arrival does not automatically make one correct. If a material restriction or market cannot be established, storing it does not make it ready to publish.
Public text and images are separate from private evidence, draft notes and internal decisions. Readers receive approved content; private review material stays in the editorial workspace.
Profiles and offers can change separately
A Casino profile and each independent Bonus Offer have their own publication. Updating one Offer does not require republishing the profile. The Offer's stages and benefits stay together so that readers see a coherent set of terms.
A language publication also has to be coherent. Its facts and translated text are reviewed together. If an approved language fallback is needed, it is recorded before publication. A language fallback never supplies another market's eligibility or another currency's terms.
Withdrawal and history
Withdrawing content removes its current publication while preserving its history. It does not delete the Casino identity or its user contributions. An older delayed update must not bring withdrawn content back.
Offer expiry, withdrawal and a failed attempt to fetch content are different situations. Their exact page messages and fallback behavior still need agreement. Retained catalogue history also does not promise an exact replay of every past score, review total or commercial element on a public page.
Read the publication model for exact candidates, separate lifecycles, dependencies and history. The editorial workspace explains staff responsibilities; source to draft explains future automation. The catalogue and publication brief collects the decisions needed for the proposed manual workflow.